A manufacturer analysis reconciled 1,329 lines across 21 entries to identify an estimated $1.106 million gross Section 232 opportunity, an identified opportunity subject to reconciliation, not a realized recovery.
Every engagement tests whether the material flow, the financial flow and the information flow tell the same story. Where they diverge, there is cost, risk, delay or integrity failure. Analytics is how the divergence is found.
What SIMS does here
Transaction testing
Entry-level testing across classification, valuation, origin and duty payment, sized against the population rather than a sample.
BOM-to-entry reconciliation
Bills of material reconciled to what was actually declared, the reconciliation that surfaces both exposure and overpayment.
Anomaly detection & scoring
Anomaly methodology, scoring, dashboards, performance measurement and decision support.
Risk profiling
Threat, vulnerability and consequence resolved at the relevant node, partner or corridor, then mitigated through people, process and technology.
Frequently asked questions
How is this different from what my broker does?
A broker files entries. This tests the pattern across all of them, classification consistency, valuation basis, duty treatment, and produces the evidence behind any correction or claim.
Certification, validation, refund and clearance are agency decisions and are never guaranteed. Recovery amounts and timelines depend on the facts.
Start with a directional read of where duty and control are leaking, in about three minutes.
Get your free Integrity Snapshot →